the art of food

•December 3, 2007 • 6 Comments

Here are a few images from the upcoming exhibition The Art of Food (for more information see the area on the right or check out the website www.artoffood.ca (thanks to DIVA…I knew what to do to build it))  Hope to see you all at the show in January – “there will be food served…yummy”

carlos-vela-marweb.jpg

Untitled – Armadillo by Carlos Vela-Martinez

(its made of chocolate!)

fossilcansweb.gif

Liquidation (detail) by Cameron MacDonald

foodwar137web.gif

Food Wars #21 by Pierre Leichner

down-and-outweb.gif

Downed on the Farm by Gayle Koyanagi

toxic-web.gif

Toxic Loaf and Bun by Nancy Strider

crab-apple-gownweb.gif

Crab Apple Gown by Nicole Dextras

fastforward: on new media art

•November 22, 2007 • Leave a Comment

There is an international forum on new media art called fastforward: on new media art

Thier website is very text heavy but try to enter their site (after selecting english) and scroll around the home page…its sort of interesting navigation, depending upon where you point, different categories surface. I cannot decide whether or not I find it interesting or irritating.

FASTFORWARD: ON NEW MEDIA ART
SECOND INTERNATIONAL FORUM
11.22.07 – 11.24.07
Meetings, debates and performances from 10.00 am to 10.00 pm
PAN | Palazzo delle Arti Napoli
Via dei Mille 60
80121 Napoli

http://www.palazzoartinapoli.net

natalie portman – gangsta rap

•November 20, 2007 • 5 Comments

ok kath, this is an snl type version of your japanese video…and yup, its rude but very funny…oh, and it also sort of promotes anger and violence, and it also looks at the idea of celebrity vs reality…and other stuff…but very funny when you think about Natalie being a squeaky clean Harvard girl

http://www.metacafe.com/w/149127/

critical review

•November 19, 2007 • 1 Comment

REVA STONE: IMAGINAL EXPRESSION
Surrey Art Gallery, January 14 – April 2, 2006


Imaginal Expression
, Reva Stone’s viewer activated, computer-generated, real-time animated, 3D environment opened at the Surrey Art Gallery on January 14, 2006. Having spent the last 10 years investigating “how we engage in the modeling, simulating, engineering and manipulation of biological life”, Stone interrogates the ambiguous realm between what is constructed and what is natural (Davison). Mirroring genetic science where software is capable of taking biotic code and converting it into a 3D image, Stone constructs and then animates her interpretation of 3D protein molecules. To reconnect this esoteric concept to the physicality of the human body, she covers their surfaces with images such as blood, hair, bruises, or scars. Using real time animation Stone creates an environment where these visual entities, projected onto the gallery wall, travel and morph in response to the movement of viewers. Possibly the most impressive impact of this exhibition is the many levels of experience that the viewer, as participant, undergoes.

When I first entered the gallery space I was struck by the nature of surprise and exploration that I felt as I ventured down the path of testing and experiencing the impact of my movements on the work. Slowly, I began to recognize some of its dynamics. When I moved some of the images followed, and at the same time other images moved in response to other viewers. Simultaneously, a morphing was underway with surface images shifting and groupings of images merging into something new. When I physically moved closer to other viewers, again new forms of morphing occurred. This aspect of the exhibition created an enjoyable sense of playfulness and a certain type of kinship with other gallery goers. For me, this was a sensation that further underlined the general premise of Stone’s examination of what is human and what is not, what is organic and what is constructed. Eventually, it became apparent that similar to other living beings, the entities projected on the gallery wall never seemed to repeat themselves, they were literally in a constant state of change.

Stone’s work also pushes the viewer to understand and question what her intentions are; questions she is addressing and positions she is challenging. As an example, the existence and shifting of images such as bruises, scars, and blood, which are placed on the surface of the molecules, seem to relate more to the surface of the human body, challenging the viewer to wonder what they represent. Perhaps Stone’s intention was to contrast the microscopic realm of scientific investigation within areas such as genetic engineering, a science that holds many hidden truths for the average person, against the physicality of the human body’s surface, something that is organic and more understandable. Or, perhaps they represent battle scars that signify the ongoing challenges that we face in coming to terms with transformations in science during such rapidly changing times. Imaginal Expression certainly succeeds at being thought provoking.

Pondering where this work situates itself within the realm of digital art I find it resonates well in a number of areas. Imaginal Expression is an obvious and delightful form of interactive art that anyone can participate in. As a form of synthetic realism, we know Stone’s work is constructed but at the same time, it is in many ways recognizable and almost seems real. Our sense of reality is tested in that we are familiar with constructed images and environments that are increasingly represented through television, print, film and other media. TV programs such as CSI, which investigates fictional crimes through the supposed analysis of the human body, uses constructed and animated micro-organisms to further their plot. Articles and programs focusing on the topic of science also use these types of images as supporting visual data. As such, the authenticity of the constructed image begins to hold some truth for the viewer.

Stone’s idea of artificial life-forms that are created through technology is also one that corresponds with works by artists such as Dieter Huber who creates mutated, (but somehow familiar) plants, humans and landscapes which reveal a connection between organic form and science. Both Stone’s and Huber’s creations are presented in a very crisp, clean and almost scientific manner resulting in the “establishment of a connection to genetic engineering, biotechnology, and changing notions of the organism in the age of new technologies” (Paul 46).

Overall, Reva Stone’s Imaginal Expression is both an intellectual and physical experience that leaves one wanting more. In reading Liane Davison’s curatorial statement, which describes how the molecules degenerate over time, after the gallery space is emptied of participating viewers, I wonder if Stone’s last farewell is one that suggests that without human contact, we too will degenerate (Davison). Just a thought.

Davison, Liane. Reva Stone: Imaginal Expression. Curatorial Statement, Surrey Art Gallery. 2006
Paul, Christiane. Digital Art. New York: Thames & Hudson, 2003. 46

imaginalexp2.jpg

 

imaginalexp4.jpg

 

imaginalexp5.jpg

 

 

who makes or owns your work

•November 13, 2007 • Leave a Comment

In the context of what we are studying and what we have been debating, this is an interesting site. There are a ton of links to follow and lots of information. In summary:

The project Who Makes and Owns Your Work has grown out of a year-long discussion held during the Open Content meetings which centred on ownership, distribution and forms of sharing within contemporary cultural and knowledge production. Through monthly meetings hosted by different organisations and a dedicated Wiki site http://www.whomakesandownsyourwork.org the project has evolved to test conceptual and political implications of openness foregrounding specific proposals made by a loose network of artists and other cultural producers. The project was initiated in the autumn of 2006 by Maria Lind and Robert Stasinski, Iaspis together with London based artist Marysia Lewandowska currently a professor at Konstfack University College of Arts, Crafts and Design and Stockholm based artists Goldin+Senneby.

final urban installation

•November 8, 2007 • Leave a Comment

Hello all, here is my final urban installation titled “Data Manipulation”. It survived for a couple of hours only…then it was torn off by somebody, leaving only slight remnants. I am hoping they tore it off as a response to the message rather than tearing it off because it was merely in their way.

DSC02393

doubleNegative Architecture

•November 3, 2007 • 2 Comments

top_img.jpg

check this out – “in corpora in Si(gh)te a number of sensors are set up in the whole area around YCAM (building and central park) to form a meshed network, so that real-time environmental information (temperature, brightness, wind direction, sound, etc.) is collected and networked. A cellular, distributed network of nodes react through realtime processing to the environmental conditions, growing and subsiding like an organism. Despite each node making local descisions and not having a central architect, the nodes inadvertently give rise to an architectural structure, both indoors in the YCAM building and outdoors in the park. The information architecture has its own spatial perception to make itself transform into various forms by providing each part of architecture with Super-Eye perceptive points with the environment, such as voluntary notation from each node of Corpora. Changes in the architecture that looks as if living in the environment are visualized for visitors, as images overlapping real scenes through the AR (augmented reality) technology at several points around YCAM building.”
http://corpora.ycam.jp/

JUSTICE – D.A.N.C.E. (for carly)

•October 26, 2007 • 2 Comments

hey there Carly – this one’s for you!  i heard the makers of this clip are ECI students?  does anyone know who they are?  (see my video clips to view)

:-)

tenori-on product demo

•October 26, 2007 • 1 Comment

i just added a video on an interface called Tenori-On, created by Media Artist Toshio Iwai (with Yamaha). Its a digital muscial instrument that lets you play music intuitively (it says on the website that its a “visible music” interface)…very cool. see my video pod to view it.

david batchelor – uplugged

•October 26, 2007 • 2 Comments

i love the unplugged kitchen stuff…i would like it as a plant in my house – his light works are pretty amazing too…

The image “http://www.trg.ed.ac.uk/image/home/batchelor-poster.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

The image “http://www.ikon-gallery.co.uk/images/DB-250wx344h.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

The image “http://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/imageuploads/1165233749_80.177.117.97.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 The image “http://www.inglebygallery.com/images/uploaded/artistimages/large_1153577064_bottles-v-close-up.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.